K Element & Ors. v Tesco Stores Limited
The 2014 Exercise was not a JES under s.80(5) Equality Act 2010 because it omitted key demand factors (physical effort/skills), was incomplete, and did not evaluate jobs as required by statute. The burden of proof under s.136 had not shifted at this preliminary stage, as a prima facie case on all aspects of the claim was not established.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms K Element & Others (Leigh Day group); Appellant: Ms K Element & Others (Harcus Sinclair group); Respondent: Tesco Stores Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Job Evaluation Study, Burden of Proof, Equality Act 2010
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms K Element & Others (Leigh Day group)
Appellant
Ms K Element & Others (Harcus Sinclair group)
Appellant
Tesco Stores Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes a Job Evaluation Study (JES) under s.80(5) Equality Act 2010?
- 2 Does the statutory burden of proof under s.136 Equality Act 2010 apply at a preliminary hearing to the JES question?
Ratio Decidendi
The 2014 Exercise was not a JES under s.80(5) Equality Act 2010 because it omitted key demand factors (physical effort/skills), was incomplete, and did not evaluate jobs as required by statute. The burden of proof under s.136 had not shifted at this preliminary stage, as a prima facie case on all aspects of the claim was not established.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The tribunal's finding that the 2014 Exercise was not a JES stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment