M Kokomane v Boots Management Services Ltd
The Employment Tribunal erred by applying too narrow a definition of protected acts and failing to analyse the context in which the claimant's complaints were made, particularly given her status as the only black employee and the nature of the grievance; the appeal is upheld and the case remitted for reconsideration.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms M Kokomane; Respondent: Boots Management Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Protected Acts, Grievance Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms M Kokomane
Appellant
Boots Management Services Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law by applying too narrow a definition of protected acts under the Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the context in which the claimant's complaints were made
- 3 Whether the claimant's grievances amounted to allegations of race discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred by applying too narrow a definition of protected acts and failing to analyse the context in which the claimant's complaints were made, particularly given her status as the only black employee and the nature of the grievance; the appeal is upheld and the case remitted for reconsideration.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- case remitted to the same Tribunal for reconsideration unless impracticable, in which case a different panel may be appointed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment