Marcia Janice Steele v Ofsted
The appellant is unsuitable to be registered as a childminder due to repeated dishonesty, lack of insight, failure to safeguard children, improper risk assessment, inability to work constructively with regulatory bodies, and conduct likely to bring the profession into disrepute. The respondent proved its case to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Marcia Janice Steele; Respondent: Ofsted
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Childminder Registration, Suitability Assessment, Safeguarding, Dishonesty, Risk Assessment, Professional Conduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Marcia Janice Steele
Appellant
Ofsted
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is suitable to be registered as a childminder
- 2 Whether the appellant's actions and lack of insight demonstrate unsuitability
- 3 Whether the appellant breached safeguarding and professional standards
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant is unsuitable to be registered as a childminder due to repeated dishonesty, lack of insight, failure to safeguard children, improper risk assessment, inability to work constructively with regulatory bodies, and conduct likely to bring the profession into disrepute. The respondent proved its case to the requisite standard.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision to cancel the appellant’s registration as a childminder is upheld.
- No reinstatement of registration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment