Mohamoud v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Section 11(2) Children Act 2004 does not impose a duty on local authorities to conduct a Children Act assessment before seeking possession under Part VII Housing Act 1996; the duty is strategic and does not override or redefine statutory functions. Failure to conduct such assessment does not provide a defence to possession proceedings, and the legislative scheme already accommodates the interests of children through existing procedures and proportionality assessments under Article 8 ECHR.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Maryam Mohamoud; First Respondent: Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea; Appellant: Ms Bushra Saleem; Second Respondent: The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Wandsworth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Possession Orders
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Intentional Homelessness, Section 11 Children Act 2004, Article 8 ECHR, Children Act Assessments, Possession Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Maryam Mohamoud
Appellant
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
First Respondent
Ms Bushra Saleem
Appellant
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Wandsworth
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Possession Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether local authorities are required by section 11(2) Children Act 2004 to conduct a Children Act assessment and treat the best interests of children as a primary consideration when seeking eviction under Part VII Housing Act 1996
- 2 Whether failure to conduct such assessment provides a defence to possession proceedings
- 3 Whether section 11(2) Children Act 2004 imposes an individually enforceable right or only a strategic obligation
Ratio Decidendi
Section 11(2) Children Act 2004 does not impose a duty on local authorities to conduct a Children Act assessment before seeking possession under Part VII Housing Act 1996; the duty is strategic and does not override or redefine statutory functions. Failure to conduct such assessment does not provide a defence to possession proceedings, and the legislative scheme already accommodates the interests of children through existing procedures and proportionality assessments under Article 8 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment