McLean v Mangat & Ors

McLean v Mangat & Ors

The judge was entitled to make findings on the company's income, number of drivers, and value of the applicant's shares based on the evidence before him. The applicant failed to show any real prospect of success on appeal or to justify the admission of fresh evidence. The applications for permission to appeal and to adduce further evidence were refused.

Parties
Appellant: Ms McLean; Respondent: Mr Mangat; Respondent: Mr Walia; Respondent: The Company (third respondent)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 November 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Disputes, Valuation of Shares, Admission of Fresh Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms McLean

Appellant

Mr Mangat

Respondent

Mr Walia

Respondent

The Company (third respondent)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in valuing the company and the applicant's shares
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in findings on company income and number of drivers
  3. 3 Whether the judge erred in excluding or limiting certain evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to make findings on the company's income, number of drivers, and value of the applicant's shares based on the evidence before him. The applicant failed to show any real prospect of success on appeal or to justify the admission of fresh evidence. The applications for permission to appeal and to adduce further evidence were refused.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused
  • Application to adduce fresh evidence refused