Shahina Chowdhury v The Information Commissioner
The Tribunal's jurisdiction under s.166 Data Protection Act 2018 is limited to procedural failings by the Commissioner. The applicant's case did not identify any such failing, nor any deficiency in the Commissioner's investigation. The application had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ms Shahina Chowdhury; Respondent: Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- proceedings struck out
- Legal Topics
- Data Protection Act 2018, Section 166 Applications, Procedural Failings, Jurisdiction of Tribunal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Shahina Chowdhury
Appellant
Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Information Commissioner failed procedurally under s.166 Data Protection Act 2018
- 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to order attendance of MI5, MI6, GCHQ or compensation
- 3 Whether the application has any reasonable prospect of success
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's jurisdiction under s.166 Data Protection Act 2018 is limited to procedural failings by the Commissioner. The applicant's case did not identify any such failing, nor any deficiency in the Commissioner's investigation. The application had no reasonable prospect of success and was struck out.
Court Disposition
proceedings struck out
Orders
- The proceedings are struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment