NHS Trust v T
On the evidence, Ms T lacks capacity to refuse blood transfusion due to continuous disordered thinking from borderline personality disorder; her advance directive is invalid; it is lawful for the Claimant to administer blood transfusions and necessary treatment using minimum force if medically advised to preserve her life or avoid imminent risk of serious injury, pending final hearing.
- Parties
- Claimant: THE NHS TRUST; Defendant: Ms T; Official Solicitor / Solicitor Advocate: Edward Solomons
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (family Division) / Interim Application for Declaratory Relief
- Outcome
- Interim declaration granted
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Consent/refuse Treatment, Advance Directives, Best Interests, Interim Declarations, Use of Force in Medical Treatment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE NHS TRUST
Claimant
Ms T
Defendant
Edward Solomons
Official Solicitor / Solicitor Advocate
Procedural Posture
Civil (family Division) / Interim Application for Declaratory Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ms T had capacity to refuse medical treatment when signing the advance directive and at present
- 2 Effect and interpretation of Ms T's advance directive
- 3 Whether an interim declaration authorising blood transfusion is lawful and appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, Ms T lacks capacity to refuse blood transfusion due to continuous disordered thinking from borderline personality disorder; her advance directive is invalid; it is lawful for the Claimant to administer blood transfusions and necessary treatment using minimum force if medically advised to preserve her life or avoid imminent risk of serious injury, pending final hearing.
Court Disposition
Interim declaration granted
Orders
- It is declared that Ms T lacks capacity to make medical treatment decisions relating to blood transfusion and lacked such capacity when signing her advance directive.
- It is lawful for the Claimant to administer blood transfusion and necessary treatment, using minimum force, if medically advised that such treatment is necessary to preserve Ms T’s life or avoid imminent risk of serious injury, until substantive hearing or further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment