Nextam Partners Ltd v Mughal & Ors

Nextam Partners Ltd v Mughal & Ors

The Defendant is found in contempt for failing to disclose his beneficial interest in properties, providing false information about those interests, and diverting rental proceeds, as the evidence establishes dishonesty and breach of the Injunction. The breaches regarding the proceeds of unauthorised transfers are not established to the criminal standard.

Parties
Claimant: Nextam Partners Ltd; Defendant: Mughal
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Committal for Contempt / Post Judgment, Pre Sentencing
Outcome
Defendant found in contempt for breaches relating to asset disclosure, false statements, and diversion of rental proceeds; not found in contempt regarding unauthorised transfer proceeds.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Freezing Injunction, Disclosure Obligations, Beneficial Ownership, False Statements
Civil Procedure Equity Fraud Contempt of Court Freezing Injunction Disclosure Obligations Beneficial Ownership False Statements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nextam Partners Ltd

Claimant

Mughal

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Committal for Contempt / Post Judgment, Pre Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant breached the Injunction by failing to disclose assets and providing false information
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant had a beneficial interest in certain properties
  3. 3 Whether the Defendant failed to disclose or repatriate proceeds of unauthorised transfers

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant is found in contempt for failing to disclose his beneficial interest in properties, providing false information about those interests, and diverting rental proceeds, as the evidence establishes dishonesty and breach of the Injunction. The breaches regarding the proceeds of unauthorised transfers are not established to the criminal standard.

Court Disposition

Defendant found in contempt for breaches relating to asset disclosure, false statements, and diversion of rental proceeds; not found in contempt regarding unauthorised transfer proceeds.

Orders

  • Sentencing reserved to next hearing
  • Parties permitted to submit sentencing submissions