Pepe's Piri Piri Ltd & Anor v Muhammad Ali Junaid Food Trends Ltd (Now Dissolved) & Ors[2019] EWHC 2769 (QB) (29 October 2019)
The Judgment Defendants are the successful parties as the Claimants recovered less than 1% of the amount claimed; accordingly, the Claimants must pay 80% of the Judgment Defendants' costs, with a 20% reduction to reflect the Claimants' limited success on liability and the Defendants' unreasonable conduct in pre-action correspondence and aspects of their defence. The costs of the Claimants' application of 5 March 2019 are to be in the case.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 2769
- Parties
- Claimant: Pepe's Piri Piri Limited; Claimant: Pepe's Franchising Limited; Defendant: Muhammad Ali Junaid; Defendant: Food Trends Limited (now dissolved); Defendant: Optimum Services Intelligence Limited; Defendant: Syed Adib Amhad; Defendant: Syed Hasib Ahmad; Defendant: Razi Siddiqui; Defendant: Infiniti Foods Limited; Defendant: Khudeja Razi; Defendant: Optifoods GSN Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Trial Costs Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimants to pay the costs of Mrs Razi and Infiniti Foods Limited in full; Claimants to pay 80% of the Judgment Defendants' costs; costs of the Claimants' 5 March 2019 application to be in the case; no order for payment on account of costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Relief From Sanctions, Pre Action Protocol, Procuring Breach of Contract, Conspiracy, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pepe's Piri Piri Limited
Claimant
Pepe's Franchising Limited
Claimant
Muhammad Ali Junaid
Defendant
Food Trends Limited (now dissolved)
Defendant
Optimum Services Intelligence Limited
Defendant
Syed Adib Amhad
Defendant
Syed Hasib Ahmad
Defendant
Razi Siddiqui
Defendant
Infiniti Foods Limited
Defendant
Khudeja Razi
Defendant
Optifoods GSN Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Trial Costs Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What order as to costs should be made in respect of the Claimants' application dated 5 March 2019?
- 2 What order should be made in respect of the costs of the claim generally?
Ratio Decidendi
The Judgment Defendants are the successful parties as the Claimants recovered less than 1% of the amount claimed; accordingly, the Claimants must pay 80% of the Judgment Defendants' costs, with a 20% reduction to reflect the Claimants' limited success on liability and the Defendants' unreasonable conduct in pre-action correspondence and aspects of their defence. The costs of the Claimants' application of 5 March 2019 are to be in the case.
Court Disposition
Claimants to pay the costs of Mrs Razi and Infiniti Foods Limited in full; Claimants to pay 80% of the Judgment Defendants' costs; costs of the Claimants' 5 March 2019 application to be in the case; no order for payment on account of costs.
Orders
- Claimants to pay the costs of Mrs Razi and Infiniti Foods Limited, assessed on the standard basis if not agreed.
- Claimants to pay 80% of the Judgment Defendants' costs, assessed on the standard basis if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment