JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov
The court found, beyond reasonable doubt, that Mr. Ablyazov was the true beneficial owner of Bubris Investments Limited, certain English real estate (Carlton House, Oaklands Park, Alberts Court), and the Schedule C companies (FM Company, Bergtrans, Carsonway), and that he deliberately failed to disclose these assets and lied under oath. The court also found that he dealt with the Stantis loans in breach of the worldwide freezing order, and that documents relied upon by Mr. Ablyazov to justify his actions were fabricated. His conduct was deliberate and intended to impede the administration of justice and frustrate the court's orders.
- Parties
- Claimant: JSC BTA Bank; Defendant: Mukhtar Ablyazov
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application (civil/commercial) / Judgment After Trial of Contempt Application
- Outcome
- Mr. Ablyazov found guilty of contempt of court on multiple grounds.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Worldwide Freezing Order, Asset Disclosure, Fraud, Receivership, Beneficial Ownership, Evidential Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JSC BTA Bank
Claimant
Mukhtar Ablyazov
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application (civil/commercial) / Judgment After Trial of Contempt Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Ablyazov was in contempt of court by failing to disclose assets in breach of a worldwide freezing order
- 2 Whether Mr. Ablyazov lied on oath regarding his assets and beneficial ownership of various companies and properties
- 3 Whether Mr. Ablyazov dealt with assets in breach of the freezing order
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, beyond reasonable doubt, that Mr. Ablyazov was the true beneficial owner of Bubris Investments Limited, certain English real estate (Carlton House, Oaklands Park, Alberts Court), and the Schedule C companies (FM Company, Bergtrans, Carsonway), and that he deliberately failed to disclose these assets and lied under oath. The court also found that he dealt with the Stantis loans in breach of the worldwide freezing order, and that documents relied upon by Mr. Ablyazov to justify his actions were fabricated. His conduct was deliberate and intended to impede the administration of justice and frustrate the court's orders.
Court Disposition
Mr. Ablyazov found guilty of contempt of court on multiple grounds.
Orders
- Finding of contempt entered against Mr. Ablyazov for failure to disclose assets, lying under oath, and dealing with assets in breach of the worldwide freezing order.
- Penalty to be determined after further submissions from counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment