London Borough of Haringey v Simawi [2018] EWHC 290 (QB) (19 February 2018)
The court exercised its discretion to order determination of the legal issue (Ground 1) even if it becomes academic, finding the issue exceptional due to its general importance, pending similar cases, and the benefits of authoritative resolution outweighing limited prejudice to the Claimant.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 290
- Parties
- Claimant: The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Haringey; Defendant: Mulkhis Simawi; Interested Party: The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Possession Proceedings / Interlocutory Order Regarding Determination of Academic Issue
- Outcome
- Order made to determine Ground 1 even if it becomes academic between the parties.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Succession, Secure Tenancies, Discrimination Under Human Rights Act, Academic Disputes in Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Haringey
Claimant
Mulkhis Simawi
Defendant
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Possession Proceedings / Interlocutory Order Regarding Determination of Academic Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 'no second succession rule' in ss.87-88 Housing Act 1985 is incompatible with Articles 8 and 14 of the Human Rights Act 1998
- 2 Whether the court should determine a legal issue if it becomes academic between the parties
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to order determination of the legal issue (Ground 1) even if it becomes academic, finding the issue exceptional due to its general importance, pending similar cases, and the benefits of authoritative resolution outweighing limited prejudice to the Claimant.
Court Disposition
Order made to determine Ground 1 even if it becomes academic between the parties.
Orders
- Directions given for evidence and skeleton arguments to progress determination of Ground 1 at hearing scheduled for 2 October 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment