PC Harrington Contractors Ltd v Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd [2007] EWHC 2833 (TCC) (30 November 2007)
The sum of £2,301,608.45 in the interim certificate does not represent an amount certified as due and payable to PCH; it is merely the aggregate of positive items before deductions. The contract and certificate make clear that, after deductions and withholdings, Multiplex does not accept that any sum is due to PCH. Therefore, PCH cannot claim that it starts the adjudication with £2.3 million in hand.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 2833 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: P C Harrington Contractors Limited; Defendant: Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Construction Contract Dispute / Application for Declaration Regarding Interim Payment Certificate and Adjudication
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payment Certificates, Withholding Notices, Adjudication Under Construction Contracts, Interpretation of Payment Clauses, Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P C Harrington Contractors Limited
Claimant
Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Construction Contract Dispute / Application for Declaration Regarding Interim Payment Certificate and Adjudication
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Multiplex's interim payment certificate certified £2,301,608.45 as due and payable to PCH
- 2 Whether Multiplex can pursue adjudication for sums already included in deductions under the interim certificate
- 3 Proper construction of payment and withholding provisions under the subcontract and the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The sum of £2,301,608.45 in the interim certificate does not represent an amount certified as due and payable to PCH; it is merely the aggregate of positive items before deductions. The contract and certificate make clear that, after deductions and withholdings, Multiplex does not accept that any sum is due to PCH. Therefore, PCH cannot claim that it starts the adjudication with £2.3 million in hand.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Declaration sought by PCH refused
- Court to hear counsel on further orders in light of the judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment