Honeywell Control Systems Ltd. v Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd. [2007] EWHC 390 (TCC) (27 February 2007)
The inspection clause in Part 1 of the Appendix is an operative provision of the sub-contract, conferring a continuing right on Honeywell to inspect the main contract as varied, including those parts of the Settlement Agreement that vary the main contract. However, the right does not extend to taking copies, only to inspection at the contractor's offices. Honeywell is entitled to specific performance of this right, limited to a redacted version of the Settlement Agreement.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 390 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Honeywell Control Systems Limited; Defendant: Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Claim for Declarations and Specific Performance or Injunction (cpr Part 8) / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Right to Inspect Contract Documents, Variation of Contract, Specific Performance, Confidentiality in Construction Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Honeywell Control Systems Limited
Claimant
Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Claim for Declarations and Specific Performance or Injunction (cpr Part 8) / Judgment After Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Honeywell have a continuing contractual right to inspect the main contract?
- 2 Does that right extend to the Settlement Agreement?
- 3 Is Honeywell entitled to obtain copies of the Settlement Agreement?
Ratio Decidendi
The inspection clause in Part 1 of the Appendix is an operative provision of the sub-contract, conferring a continuing right on Honeywell to inspect the main contract as varied, including those parts of the Settlement Agreement that vary the main contract. However, the right does not extend to taking copies, only to inspection at the contractor's offices. Honeywell is entitled to specific performance of this right, limited to a redacted version of the Settlement Agreement.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- Declarations granted that Honeywell has a continuing right to inspect the main contract and those parts of the Settlement Agreement that vary it, but not to take copies.
- Order for specific performance requiring Multiplex to permit Honeywell to view a redacted version of the Settlement Agreement at Multiplex's offices.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment