Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd & Anor
The fabrication and supply of all temporary roof steelwork was omitted from Cleveland Bridge's subcontract works by Clauses 3.1 and Schedule 3 of the Supplemental Agreement, but the design and fabrication drawings for that work remained Cleveland Bridge's responsibility as part of their remaining works under the lump sum. The phrase 'Temp Works – Roof Props' referred to all temporary works for the roof, not just the toblerones.
- Parties
- Appellant: Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited; Respondent: Cleveland Bridge UK Limited; Respondent: Cleveland Bridge Dorman Long Engineering Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Technology and Construction Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Construction Contracts, Damages for Repudiatory Breach, Scope of Subcontractor Obligations, Variation and Omission of Works
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Multiplex Constructions (UK) Limited
Appellant
Cleveland Bridge UK Limited
Respondent
Cleveland Bridge Dorman Long Engineering Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Technology and Construction Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'Temp Works – Roof Props' in the Supplemental Agreement referred to all temporary works for the roof or only to specific items (toblerones)
- 2 Whether design, drafting, and fabrication of temporary roof works fell within the lump sum or cost reimbursable elements of the contract
- 3 Whether the fabrication and supply of temporary roof steelwork was omitted from Cleveland Bridge's subcontract works
Ratio Decidendi
The fabrication and supply of all temporary roof steelwork was omitted from Cleveland Bridge's subcontract works by Clauses 3.1 and Schedule 3 of the Supplemental Agreement, but the design and fabrication drawings for that work remained Cleveland Bridge's responsibility as part of their remaining works under the lump sum. The phrase 'Temp Works – Roof Props' referred to all temporary works for the roof, not just the toblerones.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- It is declared that the fabrication and supply of all temporary roof steelwork was omitted from Cleveland Bridge's subcontract works; design and fabrication drawings for that work remained Cleveland Bridge's responsibility under the lump sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment