Wall v Mutuelle De Poitiers Assurances [2013] EWHC 53 (QB) (25 January 2013)
The issue of which expert evidence the court should order is a matter of evidence and procedure within Article 1.3 of Rome II and is therefore governed by English law (the law of the forum), not by French law (the applicable law to the substance of the claim).
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 53 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Steven John Kilfoy Wall; Defendant: Mutuelle De Poitiers Assurances
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim (cross Border Tort) / Interlocutory Determination on Expert Evidence Procedure
- Outcome
- Issue determined in favour of the claimant; English law applies to the question of expert evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Rome II Regulation, Applicable Law in Tort, Expert Evidence, Evidence and Procedure, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven John Kilfoy Wall
Claimant
Mutuelle De Poitiers Assurances
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim (cross Border Tort) / Interlocutory Determination on Expert Evidence Procedure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the issue of which expert evidence the court should order is governed by English law (law of the forum) as a matter of evidence and procedure under Article 1.3 of Rome II, or by French law (the applicable law) under Article 15 of Rome II
Ratio Decidendi
The issue of which expert evidence the court should order is a matter of evidence and procedure within Article 1.3 of Rome II and is therefore governed by English law (the law of the forum), not by French law (the applicable law to the substance of the claim).
Court Disposition
Issue determined in favour of the claimant; English law applies to the question of expert evidence.
Orders
- The issue of which expert evidence the court should order falls to be determined by reference to the law of the forum (English Law), as a matter of evidence and procedure under Article 1.3 of Rome II.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment