C Spencer Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd
The adjudicator was validly appointed as notice was sufficiently given to MW; MW's counterclaims were not advanced as set-off and thus not considered; retention monies were due as the contractual machinery had broken down and milestones were completed; none of MW's jurisdictional challenges had merit.
- Parties
- Claimant: C. Spencer Limited; Defendant: MW High Tech Projects UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- summary judgment granted
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Hybrid Contracts, Payment Notices, Retention Release, Jurisdictional Challenge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. Spencer Limited
Claimant
MW High Tech Projects UK Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator was validly appointed under the contractual provisions
- 2 Whether the adjudicator impermissibly valued at zero four counterclaims concerning excluded operations
- 3 Whether the adjudicator had jurisdiction to deal with retention monies covering both included and excluded operations
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator was validly appointed as notice was sufficiently given to MW; MW's counterclaims were not advanced as set-off and thus not considered; retention monies were due as the contractual machinery had broken down and milestones were completed; none of MW's jurisdictional challenges had merit.
Court Disposition
summary judgment granted
Orders
- MW High Tech Projects UK Limited to pay C. Spencer Limited £3,397,029.03 within seven days
- MW High Tech Projects UK Limited to pay interest of £179,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment