MXX v A Secondary School

MXX v A Secondary School

Although the relationship between the school and PXM was akin to employment and grooming began during the work experience placement, the limited nature of PXM’s role, lack of pastoral responsibility, and absence of a sufficiently close connection between his authorised activities and the torts meant that the school was not vicariously liable for his acts. The close connection test was not satisfied.

Parties
Appellant: MXX; Respondent: A Secondary School
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Vicarious Liability, Intentional Infliction of Harm, Sexual Abuse, Employment Relationship, Safeguarding in Schools
Tort Law Education Law Vicarious Liability Intentional Infliction of Harm Sexual Abuse Employment Relationship Safeguarding in Schools

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MXX

Appellant

A Secondary School

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant school is vicariously liable for sexual assaults committed by a work experience student (PXM) against a pupil (MXX)
  2. 2 Whether the relationship between the school and PXM was 'akin to employment'
  3. 3 Whether the torts were sufficiently closely connected to the relationship to impose vicarious liability

Ratio Decidendi

Although the relationship between the school and PXM was akin to employment and grooming began during the work experience placement, the limited nature of PXM’s role, lack of pastoral responsibility, and absence of a sufficiently close connection between his authorised activities and the torts meant that the school was not vicariously liable for his acts. The close connection test was not satisfied.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed