Fidelity Management SA & Ors v Myriad International Holdings BV & Ors
The tribunal addressed the essential issue put to it—whether the derogation satisfied the Competition Condition Precedent—and provided clear reasoning. There was no failure to deal with an issue under section 68(2)(d); any criticism relates to reasoning, not omission of an issue.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fidelity Management SA & Ors; Defendant: Myriad International Holdings BV & Or
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Challenge to Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Serious Irregularity, Failure to Deal With Issues, Contract Interpretation, Competition Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fidelity Management SA & Ors
Claimant
Myriad International Holdings BV & Or
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 / Judgment on Challenge to Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitral tribunal failed to deal with an essential issue under section 68(2)(d) of the Arbitration Act 1996
- 2 Whether the derogation under Greek Competition Law satisfied the Competition Condition Precedent in clause 2.1.5 of the Share Subscription Agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal addressed the essential issue put to it—whether the derogation satisfied the Competition Condition Precedent—and provided clear reasoning. There was no failure to deal with an issue under section 68(2)(d); any criticism relates to reasoning, not omission of an issue.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment