F & G, Re (Discharge of Special Guardianship Order)
As a matter of law, a Special Guardianship Order and a Care Order can coexist under the Children Act 1989, though such circumstances are rare. The judge's refusal to discharge the SGO was based on an incomplete analysis of available options for maintaining K's involvement in the children's lives. The appeal is allowed on the ground that the judge did not fully consider the range of powers available, and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant: N; First Respondent: K; Second Respondent: Liverpool City Council; Third and Fourth Respondents: F and G (by their children’s guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Family Court Decision Refusing to Discharge Special Guardianship Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed on the second ground; matter remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Special Guardianship Order, Care Order, Parental Responsibility, Discharge of Orders, Children's Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N
Appellant
K
First Respondent
Liverpool City Council
Second Respondent
F and G (by their children’s guardian)
Third and Fourth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Family Court Decision Refusing to Discharge Special Guardianship Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Special Guardianship Order (SGO) and a Care Order can lawfully coexist under the Children Act 1989
- 2 Whether the judge was wrong to refuse to discharge the SGO in the circumstances of this case
- 3 Whether the imposition of a condition on the SGO was wrong in principle or content
Ratio Decidendi
As a matter of law, a Special Guardianship Order and a Care Order can coexist under the Children Act 1989, though such circumstances are rare. The judge's refusal to discharge the SGO was based on an incomplete analysis of available options for maintaining K's involvement in the children's lives. The appeal is allowed on the ground that the judge did not fully consider the range of powers available, and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed on the second ground; matter remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- The question whether to discharge the SGO is remitted to Judge Sharpe for reconsideration.
- The mother may file an application for leave to apply to discharge the SGO.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment