N v D [2024] EWFC 309 (30 October 2024)
A general stay of proceedings under Part II of the Children Act 1989 is not appropriate where the statutory process of welfare determination has not been completed and the child's best interests require resolution of the father's applications. The mother's psychological and physical vulnerabilities can be managed by participation directions and special measures, not by indefinite stay. The complexity of the case and the child's circumstances justify joining the child as a party with a Children's Guardian. There is insufficient basis at this stage for a s.37 order. Monthly updates to the father should resume.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 309
- Parties
- Applicant: N; Respondent: D
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act 1989 Proceedings (parental Responsibility and Child Arrangements Orders) / Interlocutory Judgment on Applications for Stay, Joinder of Child, S.37 Order, and Monthly Updates
- Outcome
- Application for stay refused; child joined as party; no s.37 order; monthly updates to father to resume.
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Child Arrangements, Stay of Proceedings, Joinder of Child as Party, Section 37 Orders, Vulnerable Parties, Participation Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N
Applicant
D
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 Proceedings (parental Responsibility and Child Arrangements Orders) / Interlocutory Judgment on Applications for Stay, Joinder of Child, S.37 Order, and Monthly Updates
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a general stay of proceedings under Part II of the Children Act 1989
- 2 Whether to make an order pursuant to s.37 of the Children Act 1989
- 3 Whether the child should be joined as a party to the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
A general stay of proceedings under Part II of the Children Act 1989 is not appropriate where the statutory process of welfare determination has not been completed and the child's best interests require resolution of the father's applications. The mother's psychological and physical vulnerabilities can be managed by participation directions and special measures, not by indefinite stay. The complexity of the case and the child's circumstances justify joining the child as a party with a Children's Guardian. There is insufficient basis at this stage for a s.37 order. Monthly updates to the father should resume.
Court Disposition
Application for stay refused; child joined as party; no s.37 order; monthly updates to father to resume.
Orders
- Mother's application for a general stay of proceedings is refused.
- P is joined as a party to the proceedings and a Children's Guardian is to be appointed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment