N v N [2011] EWCA Civ 940 (30 June 2011)

N v N [2011] EWCA Civ 940 (30 June 2011)

The circuit judge erred by exceeding the limited appellate function, improperly admitting fresh evidence and substituting his own discretion for that of the District Judge without finding the original decision plainly wrong or misdirected in law. The original order should be restored.

Citation
[2011] EWCA Civ 940
Parties
Appellant: N; Respondent: N
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 June 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal (ancillary Relief / Financial Remedy) / Second Appeal to Court of Appeal From County Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; order of HHJ Rylance set aside; order of District Judge Raeside restored.
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Periodical Payments, Appellate Review, Variation of Maintenance Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

N

Appellant

N

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (ancillary Relief / Financial Remedy) / Second Appeal to Court of Appeal From County Court

  1. 1 Whether the circuit judge on appeal erred by substituting his own discretion for that of the District Judge in varying a periodical payments order
  2. 2 Whether the appellate function was exceeded by admitting fresh evidence and making new findings inconsistent with the original judge

Ratio Decidendi

The circuit judge erred by exceeding the limited appellate function, improperly admitting fresh evidence and substituting his own discretion for that of the District Judge without finding the original decision plainly wrong or misdirected in law. The original order should be restored.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; order of HHJ Rylance set aside; order of District Judge Raeside restored.

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal granted
  • Appeal allowed