N v N [2011] EWCA Civ 940 (30 June 2011)
The circuit judge erred by exceeding the limited appellate function, improperly admitting fresh evidence and substituting his own discretion for that of the District Judge without finding the original decision plainly wrong or misdirected in law. The original order should be restored.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 940
- Parties
- Appellant: N; Respondent: N
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (ancillary Relief / Financial Remedy) / Second Appeal to Court of Appeal From County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order of HHJ Rylance set aside; order of District Judge Raeside restored.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Periodical Payments, Appellate Review, Variation of Maintenance Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N
Appellant
N
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (ancillary Relief / Financial Remedy) / Second Appeal to Court of Appeal From County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the circuit judge on appeal erred by substituting his own discretion for that of the District Judge in varying a periodical payments order
- 2 Whether the appellate function was exceeded by admitting fresh evidence and making new findings inconsistent with the original judge
Ratio Decidendi
The circuit judge erred by exceeding the limited appellate function, improperly admitting fresh evidence and substituting his own discretion for that of the District Judge without finding the original decision plainly wrong or misdirected in law. The original order should be restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order of HHJ Rylance set aside; order of District Judge Raeside restored.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment