N v N
A lump sum award of £3.62m to the wife, together with assets already transferred, represents a fair departure from equality in light of the long marriage, the nature and value of inherited and gifted assets, the parties’ expectations for retirement, and the need for lifelong security, applying the sharing and needs principles discretely to individual asset classes.
- Parties
- Applicant: N; Respondent: N
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (matrimonial Financial Proceedings) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Lump sum award granted to wife; clean break ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Inherited and Gifted Assets, Clean Break, Needs Principle, Sharing Principle, Valuation of Private Company Shares, Post Separation Earnings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N
Applicant
N
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (matrimonial Financial Proceedings) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Approach to inherited and gifted assets in ancillary relief
- 2 Valuation and division of private company shares
- 3 Application of sharing and needs principles
Ratio Decidendi
A lump sum award of £3.62m to the wife, together with assets already transferred, represents a fair departure from equality in light of the long marriage, the nature and value of inherited and gifted assets, the parties’ expectations for retirement, and the need for lifelong security, applying the sharing and needs principles discretely to individual asset classes.
Court Disposition
Lump sum award granted to wife; clean break ordered.
Orders
- Husband to pay wife a lump sum of £3.62m.
- Husband to indemnify wife against relevant tax liabilities on New York apartment transfer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment