Kohanzad v Mazurek [2002] EWCA Civ 1745 (11 November 2002)

Kohanzad v Mazurek [2002] EWCA Civ 1745 (11 November 2002)

Given the age of the judgment, the applicant's failure to comply with procedural requirements, the lack of clarity and merit in the appeal, and the limited sum at stake, it is not appropriate to extend time for appeal.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1745
Parties
Applicant: Nader Kohanzad; Defendant: Leon Mazurek
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Set Down Appeal
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Vexatious Litigant, Bankruptcy
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Vexatious Litigant Bankruptcy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nader Kohanzad

Applicant

Leon Mazurek

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Set Down Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to grant an extension of time to set down an appeal
  2. 2 Effect of applicant's status as a vexatious litigant and bankrupt on appeal rights

Ratio Decidendi

Given the age of the judgment, the applicant's failure to comply with procedural requirements, the lack of clarity and merit in the appeal, and the limited sum at stake, it is not appropriate to extend time for appeal.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • No order for costs