McGhan Medical UK Ltd v. Nagor Ltd and Biosil Ltd [2001] EWHC Patents 452 (28th February, 2001)
McGhan failed to prove that Nagor's NAGOTEX product has a silicone foam covering within the meaning of claim 1 of the patent. The evidence, particularly the SEM photographs and expert testimony, did not establish the presence of a continuous open cell foam structure as required by the claim. The salt crystals in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] EWHC Patents 452
- Parties
- Claimant: McGhan Medical UK Limited; Defendant: Nagor (First and Second Defendants)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Revocation / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim for infringement dismissed; counterclaim for revocation not determined in this extract.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Infringement, Patent Validity, Construction of Patent Claims, Medical Devices, Silicone Foam Technology
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
McGhan Medical UK Limited
Claimant
Nagor (First and Second Defendants)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Revocation / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Nagor's NAGOTEX breast implant infringes claim 1 of McGhan's patent
- 2 Whether the patent is invalid for lack of novelty, obviousness, or added matter
Ratio Decidendi
McGhan failed to prove that Nagor's NAGOTEX product has a silicone foam covering within the meaning of claim 1 of the patent. The evidence, particularly the SEM photographs and expert testimony, did not establish the presence of a continuous open cell foam structure as required by the claim. The salt crystals in Nagor's process were not embedded in a fluid silicone layer, and the resulting product did not meet the claim's requirements. Therefore, there was no infringement.
Court Disposition
Claim for infringement dismissed; counterclaim for revocation not determined in this extract.
Orders
- Claim for infringement is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment