L, R. v (Non-discharge of Juror and Jury) [2024] EWCA Crim 550 (09 May 2024)
The trial judge was entitled to rely on the jurors' assurances that they could abide by their oaths and return verdicts based solely on the evidence. There was no evident need to discharge the juror or the entire jury, and the handling of the issue ensured a fair trial. The conviction is safe.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 550
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: [Name withheld]
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jury Discharge, Jury Bias, Sexual Offences, Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
[Name withheld]
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to discharge a juror who disclosed personal experience of abuse and discussed it with other jurors
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to discharge the entire jury after one juror was affected by another's disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to rely on the jurors' assurances that they could abide by their oaths and return verdicts based solely on the evidence. There was no evident need to discharge the juror or the entire jury, and the handling of the issue ensured a fair trial. The conviction is safe.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction upheld
- No order as to sentence due to lack of jurisdiction on technical sentencing issue
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment