Ackerman v Ackerman & Ors
The claimant has taken steps in relation to his assets making enforcement of a costs order difficult, has not been fully candid about his means, and has access to further funds from family; security for costs is just and will not stifle the claim if set at £600,000, with £375,000 secured by a charge on the matrimonial home.
- Parties
- Claimant: Joseph Ackerman; Defendant: Naomi Ackerman; Defendant: Barry Ackerman; Defendant: Andrew Thornhill; Defendant: Bana One Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Family Business Dispute, Enforcement of Costs Orders, Asset Transfers, Expedited Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph Ackerman
Claimant
Naomi Ackerman
Defendant
Barry Ackerman
Defendant
Andrew Thornhill
Defendant
Bana One Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Security for Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant has taken steps in relation to his assets making enforcement of a costs order difficult
- 2 Whether it is just to order security for costs and in what amount
- 3 Whether ordering security would stifle the claim
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant has taken steps in relation to his assets making enforcement of a costs order difficult, has not been fully candid about his means, and has access to further funds from family; security for costs is just and will not stifle the claim if set at £600,000, with £375,000 secured by a charge on the matrimonial home.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs granted in part
Orders
- Claimant to provide security for costs in the sum of £600,000, of which £375,000 may be furnished by way of a first charge on 38 Green Lane.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment