Basra & Ors v Badhan
The court found that Ms Badhan and Mr Basra agreed to run the companies as joint owners and that Ms Badhan has a 50% beneficial interest in the shares of the claimant companies, but not in the underlying assets or profits. The JVA was found to be a forgery and cannot be relied upon. Ms Badhan is also entitled to a 50% beneficial interest in 175 Tettenhall Rd, but not in any other properties. Claims by both parties for conversion of jewellery and for unpaid consultancy fees were rejected. The companies' claims for repayment of alleged unauthorised withdrawals and for an account were also rejected, save for an order that Ms Badhan must return or account for any company documents still in...
- Parties
- Claimant: Joga Singh Basra; Claimant: UK Finance and Business Solutions Ltd; Claimant: WM Property Associates Ltd; Claimant: ASB (Services) Ltd; Claimant: I Partner Global Ltd; Claimant: Gateway Legal & Professional Services (UK) Ltd; Claimant: Harrison Property Associates (UK) Ltd; Claimant: JNB Managerial Associates Ltd; Defendant: Narash Kumari Badhan; Additional Respondent: Palwana Holdings Ltd; Additional Respondent: Hakimpur Holdings Ltd; Additional Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (business/property) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Partially allowed and partially dismissed. Declarations of beneficial ownership in favour of Ms Badhan as to shares in companies and 175 Tettenhall Rd. All other claims and counterclaims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Beneficial Ownership of Shares, Beneficial Ownership of Property, Company Management and Control, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conversion, Freezing Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joga Singh Basra
Claimant
UK Finance and Business Solutions Ltd
Claimant
WM Property Associates Ltd
Claimant
ASB (Services) Ltd
Claimant
I Partner Global Ltd
Claimant
Gateway Legal & Professional Services (UK) Ltd
Claimant
Harrison Property Associates (UK) Ltd
Claimant
JNB Managerial Associates Ltd
Claimant
Narash Kumari Badhan
Defendant
Palwana Holdings Ltd
Additional Respondent
Hakimpur Holdings Ltd
Additional Respondent
The Chief Land Registrar
Additional Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (business/property) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ms Badhan has a beneficial interest in the claimant companies and/or properties registered in Mr Basra's name
- 2 Whether the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) is genuine and enforceable
- 3 Whether Ms Badhan is liable for unauthorised withdrawals from company accounts
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Ms Badhan and Mr Basra agreed to run the companies as joint owners and that Ms Badhan has a 50% beneficial interest in the shares of the claimant companies, but not in the underlying assets or profits. The JVA was found to be a forgery and cannot be relied upon. Ms Badhan is also entitled to a 50% beneficial interest in 175 Tettenhall Rd, but not in any other properties. Claims by both parties for conversion of jewellery and for unpaid consultancy fees were rejected. The companies' claims for repayment of alleged unauthorised withdrawals and for an account were also rejected, save for an order that Ms Badhan must return or account for any company documents still in...
Court Disposition
Partially allowed and partially dismissed. Declarations of beneficial ownership in favour of Ms Badhan as to shares in companies and 175 Tettenhall Rd. All other claims and counterclaims dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that Ms Badhan has a 50% beneficial interest in the shares of the claimant companies (except as to assets/profits)
- Declaration that Ms Badhan has a 50% beneficial interest in 175 Tettenhall Rd and order for transfer into joint names
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment