Kaur, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 795 (12 July 2024)
The grounds of appeal, including allegations of judicial bias, defective summing up, erroneous rulings, and jury pressure, are unarguable; the summing up was fair and balanced, the judge's interventions and rulings were appropriate, and no irregularity rendered the conviction unsafe.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 795
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Narinder Kaur
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Application to amend grounds of appeal and renewed application for leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Fraud, Judicial Bias, Summing Up, Jury Directions, Disclosure, Bad Character Evidence, Severance, No Case to Answer, Voir Dire, Route to Verdict
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Narinder Kaur
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's summing up was defective and prejudicial to the defence
- 2 Whether there was judicial bias against the applicant
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in various rulings (severance, no case to answer, bad character, exclusion of evidence, disclosure, calling of witness, s.34 direction)
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal, including allegations of judicial bias, defective summing up, erroneous rulings, and jury pressure, are unarguable; the summing up was fair and balanced, the judge's interventions and rulings were appropriate, and no irregularity rendered the conviction unsafe.
Court Disposition
Application to amend grounds of appeal and renewed application for leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment