Cerrone, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2895 (1 December 2011)
The seriousness of the offence justified immediate custodial sentences, but the unusual and special circumstances of the appellants as primary carers of young children warranted a reduction in sentence as an act of mercy.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Crim 2895
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Natalie Cerrone; Applicant: Nicola East; Applicant: Rachael East
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeals allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, Sentencing, Impact of Custodial Sentences on Children
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Natalie Cerrone
Applicant
Nicola East
Applicant
Rachael East
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial sentences imposed on the appellants sufficiently considered the impact on their dependent children
- 2 Whether the sentences should be suspended or reduced due to personal circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the offence justified immediate custodial sentences, but the unusual and special circumstances of the appellants as primary carers of young children warranted a reduction in sentence as an act of mercy.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed in part
Orders
- Sentences quashed and substituted: three months' imprisonment for Natalie Cerrone and Nicola East, four months' imprisonment for Rachael East
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment