Daniels, R. v

Daniels, R. v

The withdrawal of the appellant's legal team, though unnecessary and regrettable, did not render the conviction unsafe as the appellant was afforded the opportunity for new representation, the issues were clear, and there was no substantive prejudice to the fairness of the trial.

Parties
Appellant: Nathan Daniels; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Professional Conduct of Counsel, Trial Procedure, Adjournment, Fresh Evidence, Jury Discharge
Criminal Law Murder Professional Conduct of Counsel Trial Procedure Adjournment Fresh Evidence Jury Discharge

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nathan Daniels

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the withdrawal of the appellant's legal team rendered the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing an adjournment
  3. 3 Whether prosecuting counsel acted unfairly

Ratio Decidendi

The withdrawal of the appellant's legal team, though unnecessary and regrettable, did not render the conviction unsafe as the appellant was afforded the opportunity for new representation, the issues were clear, and there was no substantive prejudice to the fairness of the trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Extension of time and leave to appeal on Ground 1 granted
  • Appeal on Ground 1 dismissed