R v Nathan Foster

R v Nathan Foster

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness and aggravating features of the offending, including the psychological and physical harm to the complainant and children, the appellant's history of violence, and the high risk of serious harm. The judge was entitled to find the appellant dangerous and to impose an extended sentence and restraining order, with only a minor amendment to the restraining order's wording.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Nathan Foster
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part, otherwise dismissed
Legal Topics
False Imprisonment, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Threats to Kill, Domestic Violence, Extended Sentence, Dangerousness, Restraining Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Nathan Foster

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the custodial sentence for false imprisonment was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the judge erred in finding the appellant dangerous
  3. 3 Whether the decision to impose an extended sentence was wrong in principle

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness and aggravating features of the offending, including the psychological and physical harm to the complainant and children, the appellant's history of violence, and the high risk of serious harm. The judge was entitled to find the appellant dangerous and to impose an extended sentence and restraining order, with only a minor amendment to the restraining order's wording.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part, otherwise dismissed

Orders

  • Restraining order amended to clarify the scope of prohibited areas; all other grounds of appeal dismissed