Jenkins, R. v
Consecutive sentences for two offences of causing serious injury by dangerous driving arising from the same incident were improper; sentences should be concurrent but aggravated to reflect harm to multiple victims. The appropriate sentence, after a 20% guilty plea discount, is 3 years and 7 months' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Nathan Jenkins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Driving, Serious Injury by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing Guidelines, Totality Principle, Consecutive Vs Concurrent Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Nathan Jenkins
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether consecutive sentences for two offences of causing serious injury by dangerous driving arising from the same incident were proper
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to apply the principle of totality
- 3 Whether the judge gave excessive weight to guidelines for causing death by dangerous driving
Ratio Decidendi
Consecutive sentences for two offences of causing serious injury by dangerous driving arising from the same incident were improper; sentences should be concurrent but aggravated to reflect harm to multiple victims. The appropriate sentence, after a 20% guilty plea discount, is 3 years and 7 months' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Custodial sentences below quashed
- Concurrent sentences of 3 years and 7 months imposed on each count
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment