Accident Exchange Limited v George-Broom & Ors [2012] EWHC 207 (Admin) (01 February 2012)
Permission to bring contempt proceedings is granted because the evidence is ostensibly strong, the alleged conduct is systematic and significant, and the criteria from KJM Super Bikes are fulfilled.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 207 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Accident Exchange Limited; Defendant: Nathan John George-Broom; Defendant: Elaine Carlton Walker; Defendant: Andrew Watts; Defendant: David James; Defendant: Laurence Gray; Defendant: Keel Broom; Defendant: Duncan Carl Sadler
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Institute Contempt Proceedings / Permission Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission granted to bring contempt proceedings
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Perjury, Fraud, Expert Evidence, Credit Hire Litigation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Accident Exchange Limited
Claimant
Nathan John George-Broom
Defendant
Elaine Carlton Walker
Defendant
Andrew Watts
Defendant
David James
Defendant
Laurence Gray
Defendant
Keel Broom
Defendant
Duncan Carl Sadler
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Institute Contempt Proceedings / Permission Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to bring contempt proceedings against the respondents for allegedly giving false expert evidence in court
- 2 Whether the criteria for granting permission as set out in KJM Super Bikes Limited v Anthony James Hinton are met
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to bring contempt proceedings is granted because the evidence is ostensibly strong, the alleged conduct is systematic and significant, and the criteria from KJM Super Bikes are fulfilled.
Court Disposition
Permission granted to bring contempt proceedings
Orders
- Permission granted to Accident Exchange Limited to institute contempt proceedings against the named respondents.
- The bundle of court papers to be served on the Attorney General.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment