Schultz, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1335 (15 November 2023)
Permission to appeal against sentence is granted because the submissions regarding the sentencing judge's reliance on extrinsic factors are reasonably arguable and warrant full consideration by the court.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1335
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Nathan Schultz
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal against sentence granted; renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Nathan Schultz
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal against sentence should be granted in a case of causing death by dangerous driving
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in categorising the offence as Level 1 based on extrinsic factors
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal against sentence is granted because the submissions regarding the sentencing judge's reliance on extrinsic factors are reasonably arguable and warrant full consideration by the court.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal against sentence granted; renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed.
Orders
- Hearing adjourned for the CPS to instruct an advocate and for the victim's family to attend.
- Direction for assembly of evidence relevant to the quality of the applicant's driving before and at the time of the fatal accident.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment