R v Nathan Schultz
Permission to appeal against sentence is granted because the submissions are reasonably arguable; the hearing is adjourned to allow the CPS to instruct an advocate and the victim’s family to attend.
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Nathan Schultz
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal against sentence granted; hearing adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Nathan Schultz
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal against sentence should be granted in a case of causing death by dangerous driving
- 2 Whether the trial judge's categorisation of the offence as Level 1 was correct
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal against sentence is granted because the submissions are reasonably arguable; the hearing is adjourned to allow the CPS to instruct an advocate and the victim’s family to attend.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal against sentence granted; hearing adjourned.
Orders
- Permission to appeal against sentence granted
- Hearing adjourned for CPS to instruct advocate and for victim’s family to attend
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment