R v Nathan Shultz
The appellant's driving did not amount to level 1 seriousness as it was not a prolonged, persistent, or deliberate course of very bad driving, nor was there gross impairment from alcohol. The appropriate categorisation was level 2, warranting a starting point of five years' custody, uplifted to six years due to aggravating factors. The sentence of nine years was manifestly excessive and was reduced to six years for count 1, with a total sentence of seven years' imprisonment.
- Parties
- Appellant: Nathan Shultz; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal After Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing Guidelines, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nathan Shultz
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal After Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's driving prior to the fatal collision amounted to level 1 seriousness under the Sentencing Guidelines for causing death by dangerous driving
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's driving did not amount to level 1 seriousness as it was not a prolonged, persistent, or deliberate course of very bad driving, nor was there gross impairment from alcohol. The appropriate categorisation was level 2, warranting a starting point of five years' custody, uplifted to six years due to aggravating factors. The sentence of nine years was manifestly excessive and was reduced to six years for count 1, with a total sentence of seven years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
Orders
- Sentence of nine years' imprisonment on count 1 quashed and replaced with six years' imprisonment
- All other sentences remain the same except the extended period of disqualification reduced to 42 months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment