R v Nathan Wilson & Ors
The sentences imposed were not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge correctly applied the relevant guidelines, properly assessed the appellants' roles and the scale of offending, gave appropriate credit for guilty pleas and mitigation, and the uplifts for totality were justified and discounted. There was no error warranting appellate intervention.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Nathan Wilson; Applicant: Endrit Fejzullai; Applicant: Krystztof Budziskewski
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- all appeals and applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Conspiracy, Sentencing, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Nathan Wilson
Appellant
Endrit Fejzullai
Applicant
Krystztof Budziskewski
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the appellants for conspiracy to supply controlled drugs were manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the application of sentencing guidelines, credit for guilty pleas, and consideration of mitigating/aggravating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive. The sentencing judge correctly applied the relevant guidelines, properly assessed the appellants' roles and the scale of offending, gave appropriate credit for guilty pleas and mitigation, and the uplifts for totality were justified and discounted. There was no error warranting appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
all appeals and applications dismissed
Orders
- Appeal of Nathan Wilson dismissed
- Extension of time granted to Endrit Fejzullai but renewed application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment