National Crime Agency, Re
Section 357(2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 does not preclude the making of a disclosure order in a money laundering investigation merely because some bank accounts are subject to account freezing orders in a concurrent frozen funds investigation; the focus must be on the type of investigation for which the disclosure order is sought, not on the overlap of accounts or potential effects on other investigations.
- Parties
- Appellant: National Crime Agency; Other Investigation Agency: City of London Police
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court (divisional Court) Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Orders, Money Laundering Investigation, Frozen Funds Investigation, Interpretation of S.357(2) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Crime Agency
Appellant
City of London Police
Other Investigation Agency
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court (divisional Court) Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.357(2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 precludes a disclosure order in a money laundering investigation where bank accounts are subject to account freezing orders in a concurrent frozen funds investigation
- 2 Proper interpretation of 'in relation to' in s.357(2)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 357(2) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 does not preclude the making of a disclosure order in a money laundering investigation merely because some bank accounts are subject to account freezing orders in a concurrent frozen funds investigation; the focus must be on the type of investigation for which the disclosure order is sought, not on the overlap of accounts or potential effects on other investigations.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The Note appended to the disclosure order, excluding accounts subject to account freezing orders, is set aside.
- First question in the case stated answered in the negative; second question declined to be answered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment