Paramjit Bhogal (aka Paramjeet Bhogal) v National Education Union
The NEU's Disciplinary Procedures, properly construed, prohibit legal representation at the NAC hearing. While natural justice can, in exceptional cases, require legal representation, the facts here do not approach such circumstances: the allegations and sanctions are not of such seriousness, there is no credible evidence of career-ending consequences, and the process is lay-led. There is no waiver or estoppel. There is no serious issue to be tried and the balance of convenience does not favour an injunction.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Paramjit Bhogal (aka Mr Paramjeet Bhogal); Defendant: National Education Union
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Injunction Application / Interim Application for Injunction (high Court, Post Transfer From County Court)
- Outcome
- Application for interim injunction dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Natural Justice, Legal Representation in Disciplinary Proceedings, Interpretation of Trade Union Rules, Interim Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Paramjit Bhogal (aka Mr Paramjeet Bhogal)
Claimant
National Education Union
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Injunction Application / Interim Application for Injunction (high Court, Post Transfer From County Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the NEU's disciplinary procedures permit legal representation at the National Appeals Committee (NAC) hearing
- 2 Whether natural justice requires legal representation at the NAC hearing in the circumstances of this case
- 3 Whether the NEU is estopped or has waived its right to refuse legal representation at the NAC hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The NEU's Disciplinary Procedures, properly construed, prohibit legal representation at the NAC hearing. While natural justice can, in exceptional cases, require legal representation, the facts here do not approach such circumstances: the allegations and sanctions are not of such seriousness, there is no credible evidence of career-ending consequences, and the process is lay-led. There is no waiver or estoppel. There is no serious issue to be tried and the balance of convenience does not favour an injunction.
Court Disposition
Application for interim injunction dismissed
Orders
- Application for interim injunction refused; disciplinary proceedings may continue without legal representation for the claimant at the NAC hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment