A Lovell v National Highways Limited
The tribunal found that giving the claimant a level 5 appraisal score in June 2022 and certain comments by her line manager constituted unfavourable treatment and harassment arising from disability, and were not objectively justified. Other complaints of unfavourable treatment and harassment failed as the respondent's actions were proportionate and justified by legitimate aims.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms A Lovell; Respondent: National Highways Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Partially successful for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Harassment, Reasonable Adjustments, Performance Management, Compensation for Injury to Feelings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms A Lovell
Claimant
National Highways Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether unfavourable treatment arose from disability under s.15 Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether harassment related to disability occurred under s.26 Equality Act 2010
- 3 Whether treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that giving the claimant a level 5 appraisal score in June 2022 and certain comments by her line manager constituted unfavourable treatment and harassment arising from disability, and were not objectively justified. Other complaints of unfavourable treatment and harassment failed as the respondent's actions were proportionate and justified by legitimate aims.
Court Disposition
Partially successful for claimant
Orders
- Compensation for injury to feelings awarded: £2,360.00
- Interest awarded at 8% on £1,500.00 from 04.05.2022 to 04.06.2025
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment