Natural England v Andrew Jonathan Chubb Cooper
Natural England, as regulator under the 2006 Regulations, has an incidental statutory power under s.13(1) of NERCA 2006 to seek an injunction to secure compliance with the consenting regime, including protection of archaeological heritage, and has standing to do so without the Attorney General's consent.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Natural England; Respondent: Andrew Jonathan Chubb Cooper
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Regulatory Enforcement, Injunctive Relief, Standing of Statutory Bodies, Environmental Impact Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Natural England
Appellant
Andrew Jonathan Chubb Cooper
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Natural England has power and standing to obtain an injunction to secure compliance with the Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (England) (No. 2) Regulations 2006
- 2 Whether NE's statutory remit includes protection of archaeological heritage
- 3 Whether NE's functions under the 2006 Regulations confer an incidental power to seek injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
Natural England, as regulator under the 2006 Regulations, has an incidental statutory power under s.13(1) of NERCA 2006 to seek an injunction to secure compliance with the consenting regime, including protection of archaeological heritage, and has standing to do so without the Attorney General's consent.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Permanent injunction granted restraining Mr Cooper from cultivating the relevant fields except in compliance with the 2006 Regulations
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment