Soroya, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 3120 (12 December 2006)
Fresh evidence regarding the complainant's credibility does not render the conviction unsafe; the defence had opportunity to explore the complainant's past at trial, and the evidence would not have benefited the appellant. The complainant's actions post-trial and alleged contradictions do not undermine her credibility or the safety of the conviction.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Crim 3120
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Naveed Soroya
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Credibility of Complainant, Fresh Evidence, Sexual Offences Act 2003, Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Naveed Soroya
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence regarding complainant's credibility renders conviction unsafe
- 2 Whether complainant's actions post-trial affect credibility and safety of conviction
Ratio Decidendi
Fresh evidence regarding the complainant's credibility does not render the conviction unsafe; the defence had opportunity to explore the complainant's past at trial, and the evidence would not have benefited the appellant. The complainant's actions post-trial and alleged contradictions do not undermine her credibility or the safety of the conviction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction upheld
- Appellant to pay £4,338 towards prosecution costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment