Global Display Solutions Ltd & Ors v NCR Financial Solutions Group Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 236 (Comm) (09 February 2021)
Permission to amend is granted for all proposed amendments except the plea concerning the November 2010 factory visit. The permitted amendments do not materially expand the factual or legal scope, relate to facts already pleaded, and do not cause injustice to the Defendants. The balance of justice favours allowing the amendments to ensure the real issues are determined.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 236 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Global Display Solutions Limited; Claimant: GDS Technology Limited; Claimant: Global Display Solutions SPA; Claimant: Global Display Solutions (Suzhou) Co Limited; Defendant: NCR Financial Solutions Group Limited; Defendant: NCR Global Solutions Limited; Defendant: NCR Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Application for Permission to Re Amend Pleadings During Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Breach of Contract, Deceit, Conspiracy, Intimidation, Rectification, Release and Waiver
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Global Display Solutions Limited
Claimant
GDS Technology Limited
Claimant
Global Display Solutions SPA
Claimant
Global Display Solutions (Suzhou) Co Limited
Claimant
NCR Financial Solutions Group Limited
Defendant
NCR Global Solutions Limited
Defendant
NCR Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Application for Permission to Re Amend Pleadings During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to the Claimants to re-amend their pleadings during trial
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments materially expand the factual or legal scope of the case
- 3 Whether the amendments cause injustice or prejudice to the Defendants
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend is granted for all proposed amendments except the plea concerning the November 2010 factory visit. The permitted amendments do not materially expand the factual or legal scope, relate to facts already pleaded, and do not cause injustice to the Defendants. The balance of justice favours allowing the amendments to ensure the real issues are determined.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Permission to amend pleadings granted except for the November 2010 factory visit plea
- Defendants may serve responsive amendments and ask further questions of witnesses if necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment