Global Display Solutions Ltd & Ors v NCR Financial Solutions Group Ltd & Anor
NCR knowingly gave false forecasts to GDS from July 2011 to January 2013, breaching contract and committing the tort of deceit and unlawful means conspiracy. The Letter Agreement, on its true construction, does not preclude all claims based on false forecasts; rectification for mutual or unilateral mistake is not available as NCR failed to prove a common or unilateral intention to settle such claims. The intimidation claim fails as there was no relevant threat by NCR. GDS is entitled to exemplary damages due to NCR's calculated and outrageous conduct.
- Parties
- Claimant: Global Display Solutions Limited; Claimant: GDS Technology Limited; Claimant: Global Display Solutions SPA; Claimant: Global Display Solutions (Suzhou) Co Limited; Defendant: NCR Financial Solutions Group Limited; Defendant: NCR Global Solutions Limited; Defendant: NCR Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Trial (queen's Bench Division, England and Wales) / Judgment After Split Trial on Liability and Construction/rectification of Settlement Agreement
- Outcome
- GDS's claims for breach of contract, deceit, and unlawful means conspiracy are established in principle; Letter Agreement does not bar all claims; NCR's rectification claim dismissed; intimidation claim dismissed; exemplary damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Deceit, Breach of Contract, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Intimidation, Rectification, Settlement Agreements, Exemplary Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Global Display Solutions Limited
Claimant
GDS Technology Limited
Claimant
Global Display Solutions SPA
Claimant
Global Display Solutions (Suzhou) Co Limited
Claimant
NCR Financial Solutions Group Limited
Defendant
NCR Global Solutions Limited
Defendant
NCR Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Trial (queen's Bench Division, England and Wales) / Judgment After Split Trial on Liability and Construction/rectification of Settlement Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether NCR gave false forecasts to GDS in breach of contract and/or tort of deceit
- 2 Whether GDS's claims are precluded by the terms of the Letter Agreement (settlement)
- 3 Whether the Letter Agreement should be rectified for mutual or unilateral mistake
Ratio Decidendi
NCR knowingly gave false forecasts to GDS from July 2011 to January 2013, breaching contract and committing the tort of deceit and unlawful means conspiracy. The Letter Agreement, on its true construction, does not preclude all claims based on false forecasts; rectification for mutual or unilateral mistake is not available as NCR failed to prove a common or unilateral intention to settle such claims. The intimidation claim fails as there was no relevant threat by NCR. GDS is entitled to exemplary damages due to NCR's calculated and outrageous conduct.
Court Disposition
GDS's claims for breach of contract, deceit, and unlawful means conspiracy are established in principle; Letter Agreement does not bar all claims; NCR's rectification claim dismissed; intimidation claim dismissed; exemplary damages awarded.
Orders
- Declaration that NCR is liable for breach of contract, deceit, and unlawful means conspiracy (subject to reserved issues of reliance, causation, and loss)
- Declaration that the Letter Agreement does not preclude all claims based on false forecasts
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment