Arnot v Sprake & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 341 (22 February 2001)
The accident was caused solely by the claimant's excessive speed in approaching a blind bend, not by any negligence of the defendants; the road and vehicle were not so unusual as to require exceptional precautions, and the alleged failures (warnings, alternative route) were not negligent or causative.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 341
- Parties
- Claimant: Lindsey Galbraith Arnot; First Defendant: Andrew William Sprake; Second Defendant: Peter Batchelor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Duty of Care, Causation, Standard of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lindsey Galbraith Arnot
Claimant
Andrew William Sprake
First Defendant
Peter Batchelor
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were negligent in causing the accident
- 2 Whether the claimant was contributorily negligent
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in finding negligence against the defendants and rejecting contributory negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The accident was caused solely by the claimant's excessive speed in approaching a blind bend, not by any negligence of the defendants; the road and vehicle were not so unusual as to require exceptional precautions, and the alleged failures (warnings, alternative route) were not negligent or causative.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; claim dismissed
Orders
- judgment for claimant set aside
- claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment