Whittle v Bennett
The respondent's speed and following distance, even if in breach of the Highway Code, were not causative of the accident. The appellant's unexpected and grossly negligent U-turn was the sole cause. The duty to maintain a safe distance was not owed to the appellant in these circumstances, and the accident would not have been avoided even if the respondent had complied with the speed limit and recommended distance.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: John Whittle (A Patient by his litigation friend Deborah Heron); Defendant/respondent: James Bennett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Causation, Duty of Care, Contributory Negligence, Apportionment of Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Whittle (A Patient by his litigation friend Deborah Heron)
Claimant/appellant
James Bennett
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was negligent in speed and following distance
- 2 Whether any negligence was causative of the accident
- 3 Whether the appellant's contributory negligence precluded recovery
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's speed and following distance, even if in breach of the Highway Code, were not causative of the accident. The appellant's unexpected and grossly negligent U-turn was the sole cause. The duty to maintain a safe distance was not owed to the appellant in these circumstances, and the accident would not have been avoided even if the respondent had complied with the speed limit and recommended distance.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment