Abdel-Khalek v Ali

Abdel-Khalek v Ali

The appeal was dismissed because the claimant failed to prove that the impression given to the employer—that the complication rate was higher than expected—was a misstatement, and failed to establish causation between any negligent misstatement and the withdrawal of the job offer. The judge's approach to the burden of proof and the separation of misstatements was correct.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Mohammed Abdel-Khalek; Respondent/defendant: Qazi Ali
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligent Misstatement, Duty of Care, Causation, References and Employment, Burden of Proof
Tort Law Employment Law Negligent Misstatement Duty of Care Causation References and Employment Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Abdel-Khalek

Appellant/claimant

Qazi Ali

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant made negligent misstatements about the claimant to a prospective employer
  2. 2 Whether any negligent misstatement caused the withdrawal of a job offer to the claimant
  3. 3 Whether the claimant discharged the burden of proving the statements were misstatements and caused loss

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the claimant failed to prove that the impression given to the employer—that the complication rate was higher than expected—was a misstatement, and failed to establish causation between any negligent misstatement and the withdrawal of the job offer. The judge's approach to the burden of proof and the separation of misstatements was correct.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed