Ellis v Ellis

Ellis v Ellis

The judge was entitled to find, to the criminal standard, that Mr Ellis had the means to pay the arrears and wilfully refused or neglected to do so. The committal order, suspended for 21 days, was appropriate given the appellant's conduct, lack of credible evidence of inability to pay, and the need to enforce the...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Respondent: Kim M Ellis; Appellant: Neil A Ellis
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Family Law (maintenance/committal) / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Maintenance Orders, Committal for Non Payment, Variation of Orders, Enforcement of Judgments
Family Law Civil Procedure Maintenance Orders Committal for Non Payment Variation of Orders Enforcement of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kim M Ellis

Respondent

Neil A Ellis

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal Family Law (maintenance/committal) / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's failure to pay maintenance was due to 'wilful refusal' or 'culpable neglect'
  2. 2 Whether the committal order and its suspension were appropriate given the appellant's means
  3. 3 Whether the judge properly considered alternatives to imprisonment and the appellant's financial circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to find, to the criminal standard, that Mr Ellis had the means to pay the arrears and wilfully refused or neglected to do so. The committal order, suspended for 21 days, was appropriate given the appellant's conduct, lack of credible evidence of inability to pay, and the need to enforce the maintenance order for the child's benefit. Unilateral reduction of payments and deceptive conduct towards the respondent justified the judge's findings and the order made.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Committal order (suspended for 21 days) stands; appellant to pay £2,605 by deadline and comply with ongoing maintenance obligations.