Webb-Johnson, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1084 (20 May 2025)
There was no sufficient evidential basis before the judge to establish, to the civil standard, the necessity for a restraining order post-acquittal, given the absence of recent incidents, lack of complainant statements expressing current need, and the passage of over six years since the last alleged conduct. Agreement of the appellant and convenience to the parties cannot substitute for the statutory requirement of necessity based on evidence.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1084
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Neil Webb-Johnson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Post Acquittal Restraining Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Restraining Orders, Acquittal, Protection From Harassment, Necessity Test, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Neil Webb-Johnson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Post Acquittal Restraining Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidential basis for necessity of a restraining order post-acquittal was established
- 2 Whether the judge erred in law by making a restraining order absent sufficient evidence of future risk
Ratio Decidendi
There was no sufficient evidential basis before the judge to establish, to the civil standard, the necessity for a restraining order post-acquittal, given the absence of recent incidents, lack of complainant statements expressing current need, and the passage of over six years since the last alleged conduct. Agreement of the appellant and convenience to the parties cannot substitute for the statutory requirement of necessity based on evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- restraining order quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment