Coulson & Ors v Wilby

Coulson & Ors v Wilby

The defendants' repeated, targeted, and highly offensive online publications about the claimants, including personal attacks, false allegations, and misuse of private images, amount to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. The conduct is oppressive, calculated to cause distress, and not justified by any public interest. The claimants are likely to succeed at trial, and interim injunctive relief is justified to restrain further harassment.

Parties
Claimant: Anthony Coulson; Claimant: Katherine Lawcock; Claimant: Rebecca Reed; Defendant: Neil Wilby; Defendant: Peter Hofschröer
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Application for Injunction
Outcome
Interim injunctions granted
Legal Topics
Harassment, Defamation, Privacy, Interim Injunctions, Freedom of Expression
Tort Civil Procedure Human Rights Harassment Defamation Privacy Interim Injunctions Freedom of Expression

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Coulson

Claimant

Katherine Lawcock

Claimant

Rebecca Reed

Claimant

Neil Wilby

Defendant

Peter Hofschröer

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Application for Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants' online publications amount to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997
  2. 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to interim injunctive relief restraining further publication and compelling removal of material
  3. 3 Whether the threshold for interim relief under section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 is met

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants' repeated, targeted, and highly offensive online publications about the claimants, including personal attacks, false allegations, and misuse of private images, amount to harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. The conduct is oppressive, calculated to cause distress, and not justified by any public interest. The claimants are likely to succeed at trial, and interim injunctive relief is justified to restrain further harassment.

Court Disposition

Interim injunctions granted

Orders

  • Defendants restrained from harassing the claimants by publication of the identified material or similar material online
  • Defendants required to take down the specified internet postings